In Friday’s post on my other blog I described some of my experiences attempting to photograph lunar rainbows, but here are some tips for capturing your own moonbow images.
The moon will become full at 5:19 Wednesday morning, so Tuesday night will provide the brightest moonlight, and the best chance to photograph a lunar rainbow this month—if the weather cooperates. Unfortunately the forecast calls for rain. If the predictions are faulty, and some moonlight manages to break through the clouds, cool temperatures will probably limit the amount of spray on Upper Yosemite Fall, so Lower Yosemite Fall may work better. For the upper fall, you might be better off waiting for the next full moon on May 27th. For detailed information on times and places to photograph lunar rainbows in Yosemite, see Don Olson’s site.
For those who aspire to capture lunar rainbows, here are some tips.
Any digital SLR will work, but full-frame sensors usually produce less noise and work better for the long exposures required at night. A sturdy tripod is essential, plus a locking cable release or electronic release. You’ll want a good flashlight or headlamp, a watch to time long exposures, and a cloth for wiping spray off the lens if you’re at the lower fall. Long exposures drain batteries quickly, so make sure your camera battery is fully charged—and your spare too.
Focus and Depth of Field
To make exposure times reasonably short, you’ll have to keep your aperture wide open, or close to it. That means you won’t get much depth of field, so try to exclude foregrounds from your compositions. This shallow depth of field makes focusing critical. It’s obviously difficult to focus manually in the dark, and autofocus won’t work either. In the past I’d just manually set the lens at infinity, but many lenses now focus past infinity, making the correct focusing point difficult to determine. The solution is to find something distant that’s bright enough to focus on, like the moon itself, car headlights, or perhaps a bright light that you place far away. Then focus on that bright spot, using either manual or autofocus. The most precise method is probably focusing manually during a zoomed-in look in live view. Once you’ve set the focus, turn autofocus off and don’t touch the focusing ring—leave the lens set at this distance for all your images. You might even tape the focusing ring so it doesn’t move.
It’s tempting to push up the ISO and make your exposure times shorter, but you’ll get less noise with longer exposures at lower ISOs. Ideally you’d like to use your camera’s native ISO, which for Canons is 100, and most Nikons is 200. Since light meters don’t work under such low light levels, here are some recommended exposure times. You’ll have to set the camera on Bulb and use a locking cable release.
ISO 100: 3 minutes at f/2.8; 6 minutes at f/4
ISO 200: 90 seconds at f/2.8; 3 minutes at f/4; 6 minutes at f/5.6
ISO 400: 45 seconds at f/2.8; 90 seconds at f/4; 3 minutes at f/5.6; 6 minutes at f/8
I don’t recommend exposures longer than six minutes, as the rainbow will move while the shutter is open and the bands of color will blur together. On the other hand, most lenses are not very sharp at their widest aperture. So if your maximum aperture is f/2.8, I’d recommend stopping down to f/4; if your maximum aperture is f/4 I’d recommend stopping down to f/5.6—if you can do so without making the exposure too long, or pushing the ISO too high. There are always tradeoffs in photography. If your lens’ widest aperture is f/4 on a Canon camera, you could keep the ISO at 100 and expose for six minutes at f/4, or push the ISO to 200 and expose for six minutes at f/5.6. You’ll get better lens resolution at f/5.6, especially in the corners, but you’ll get more noise at the higher ISO. I’d try it both ways, and see if noise reduction software can cure your problems with the ISO 200 capture.
If you want pinpoint stars in the sky, rather than star streaks or trails, you’ll have to use shorter exposures and push the ISO up even higher. You’ll want to keep the exposures down to 30 seconds or less with a wide-angle lens, and 15 seconds or less with a normal or telephoto lens. With a wide-angle, try 20 seconds at f/4 and 1600 ISO. The photograph will be noisy, but with many cameras the noise won’t be too objectionable.
Many digital SLRs have a “long exposure noise reduction” option buried somewhere in their menus. With this on, after finishing a long exposure the camera will take another exposure of the same length with the shutter closed—a black image—then compare the two captures and try to subtract the noise out of the first one. Since it’s actually making two exposures, it takes twice as long to capture one frame. On my camera (Canon 1Ds Mark II) the noise reduction has no visible effect, so I leave it off. But I’ve heard that it may help on other models. The only way to know is to test your camera with this option turned on and off, and compare the results. I’d at least recommend keeping it off initially, while you test exposure times, then you might turn it on once you have everything set.
If you’re good at exposure calculations you can boost the ISO initially to shorten exposure times for some test shots. For example, try 20 seconds at f/4 with 1600 ISO. If this looks okay, then this is the equivalent of 6 minutes at f/4 and 100 ISO, so you can then try the longer exposure at the lower ISO with confidence that it’s correct.
When judging exposures, don’t rely on the appearance of your camera’s LCD screen. At night even a severely underexposed photograph will look much brighter on screen than the surroundings, fooling you into thinking that you’ve made correct exposure when it’s actually way off. Use the histogram! For most moonlight photographs, the histogram should be pushed as far to the right as possible without touching the right edge—that is, the image should be as light as you can make without overexposing anything. This will give you the most noise-free capture. You can, and probably should, darken the image later in software to create more of a nighttime feeling.
Here’s the unprocessed Raw file of a photograph that I made last year. It looks too light for a nighttime image, but it’s noise-free.
Here’s its histogram. Note that the brightest pixels are near, but not touching, the right edge—ideal for most nighttime captures.
If the histogram is pushed over to the left, like this, the photograph is too dark. Make a longer exposure.
Here’s the final processed image. I darkened it overall, then lowered the sky values even further, to make it look more like a night scene.